Thesis Options |
(1) a single document generally of 12,500-16,000 words (45 -60 pages), and no more than 20,000 words (80 pages, not including textual apparatus), presenting a sustained argument and generally broken into closely related chapters or sections; (2) two article-length essays developing arguments on distinct but related topics, each 5000-6500 words (20-25 pages), with a framing introduction that addresses their conceptual, historical, or methodological relationship. |
Thesis Timeline - Year 1 |
Winter: |
Thesis Timeline - Year 2 |
All Year:
Fall:
Winter:
Spring: |
Thesis Committee Option 1 (Single Document) |
Major Professor. The primary director, and the person you work with most closely. This person is typically an expert in the field you are studying. Once established, the Major Professor signs most of the forms you need to submit to the Grad School. The Major Professor reads all your drafts. Minor Professor (second reader). The role of the second reader varies, depending on what the committee determines at the Program Meeting. Some second readers read all drafts; others begin reading only once the thesis is advanced to a certain point. The second reader may or may not be a specialist in the field you study; often, second and third readers are chosen as much for methodological affinities as for specific expertise in the area you are studying. Minor Professor (third reader). As with the second reader, this person’s role varies from committee to committee. Often, the third reader enters the draft-reading process only once you have a near-complete document in hand. GCR (Graduate Council Representative). The GCR is a representative from a discipline outside our own. The GCR is not an “advisor” in the typical sense. Instead, the GCR looks at the final draft to ensure that it conforms to University standards, and attends the defense for the same reason. You are responsible for contacting potential GCRs, using the “Get GCR List” link from the Graduate School website. You may wish to review the online pages for each name on the list, looking for a GCR you think might have interest in your topic (this, however, is not necessary). Contact one potential GCR at a time, by email, giving a very brief synopsis of your thesis asking them if they’d like to serve as GCR on your committee. Work through your list until you succeed. (You can generate a new list if you exhaust your first). |
Thesis Committee Option 2 (Pair of Articles) |
Advisor No. 1 and Director. The primary director for the first of your two articles, and the person responsible for signing your forms and ensuring the cogency of the entire document. This person is typically an expert in the field addressed by the first article, and is responsible for overseeing the project as a whole. Advisor No. 2. The primary director for the second of your two articles. This person is typically an expert in the field addressed by the second article. Minor Professor (third reader). The role of the third reader varies, depending on what the committee determines at the Program Meeting. Some third readers read all drafts; others begin reading only once the the-sis is advanced to a certain point. The third reader may or may not be a specialist in the fields you treat in the article; often, the third reader is chosen as much for methodological affinities as for specific expertise in the area you are studying. GCR (Graduate Council Representative). Same as Option #1, q.v. NOTE: If your two articles are in the same field, you may choose to have only a single Major Professor, in which case follow the model for Option #1. |
Choosing a Topic |
Some students arrive in the MA Program with thesis plans already in mind. Others only begin to formulate ideas after arriving. Both methods produce excellent results. You are not expected to have a definite thesis area and general topic (“digital rhetoric,” say, or “contemporary literature and theory”) until the end of your first winter term, when you constitute your committee. You are not expected to have a definite thesis plan until the end of your first year. Once constituted, your committee will help you plan the evolution of your area into a topic, narrowing your interests into a focused project. Faculty are always happy to speak with you about your interests, their interests, and the compatibility thereof. Use the following profiles, which provide a snapshot of areas of faculty advising, to help you know where to seek additional information. |
Constituting a Committee |
The major resources for constituting a committee include:
ENG 514, which offers a broad introduction to research methods in the fields of literature and culture and rhetoric and composition. (ii)the faculty profiles at the end of this booklet;(iii)the courses you’ve taken;(iv)the Graduate Coordinator, who can help point you in the direction of faculty with particular expertise in areas that interest you;(v)most importantly, the faculty themselves, who are eager to help you succeed. Faculty are always happy to meet with you, both during and outside of the special designated week. |
Possible Committee Members |
Anderson, Chris
Harrell, Anna. “Believing Details”
Barbour, Richmond
Appel, Ian. “‘Present Fears’ and ‘Horrible Imaginings’: Gothic Elements in Shakespearean Tragedy”
Betjemann, Peter
Evans, Laura. “American Identity at a Crossroads: Cotton Mather’s Wonders of the Invisible World”
Bude, Tekla
Davison, Neil
Kramer, Johanne. “George Bernard Shaw’s Big Three: An Althusserian Reading of Man and Superman, John Bull’s Other Island, and Major Barbara”
Gottlieb, Evan
Amelia England, “The Life of Things”: Weird Realism in Samuel Taylor Coleridge and William Wordsworth’s Lyrical Ballads” (defended Sept. 2014)
Helle, Anita
Maybaum, Lenore. “Traversing the Displaced: Incarcerated Women’s Writing Selves”
Jensen, Tim
Brown, Nicholas. “Extending and Visualizing Authorship in Comic Studies”
Lewis, Jon
Yeager, Angela. “Immigrant Encounters: Film Narratives of the Modern Immigrant”
Malewitz, Ray
Randlemon, Dan. “David Foster Wallace's Communal Middle Ground.”
Olson, Rebecca
Marie Wiley, "Genres at Play: History, Tragedy, and Comedy in Shakespeare’s Richard II"
Osagie, Iyunolu
Michael New, “Instrumental Voices: Experimental Poetry and the Jazz Tradition.”
Pflugfelder, Ehren
Gail Cole, "Principles and Practices in Online Writing Instruction"
Ribero, Ana Milena
Sheehan, Elizabeth
Trowbridge, A. Hayley. "In and Out of Touch : Fabricated Histories in Nella Larsen's Passing and James VanDerZee's Studio Portraiture."
Tolar-Burton, Vicki
Robinson, Tracy Ann. “Charting Their Own Course as Writers: A Study of Writing-Intensive Students’ Self Assessment and Goal Setting at Start of Term”
Ward, Megan
Surface, Samara. “Adaptation Theory and the Lizzie Bennett Diaries”
Williams, Tara
Tatom, Simon. “Fantastic Histories: How Malory’s Morte d’Arthur Influenced Tolkien’s The Silmarillion” |
Useful Resources |
The Graduate School prescribes certain formatting for the thesis, certain deadlines for the submission of scheduling forms, and certain requirements for what you must do before and after the defense. All of this information can be found in the in the Graduate School's Online Thesis Guide. |
FAQS |
1. Can a member of the MFA faculty sit on my committee?
4. Can I include a member of another department on my committee?
5. Why does the name of the School Director appear as my instructor for thesis credits? |